JPNor

Name: JPNor
Joined On: Nov 17, 2006
Maintag: GunMunkee
Age: 29
Occupation: Sales, Video Production
Location: New Hampshire
Currently: Offline
Last seen: 12/3/08
359 Member Points
My Gamertags
GunMunkee
My Clans
My Bookmarks
Big0ne
RogueRedneck
SoupNazzi
Who has bookmarked me?
ATC_1982
BalekFekete
Caesar
donkhorse
ImMrPete
ixtab
10/06/08 Return to main blog
WTF happened to Rolling Stone?
I have been reading Rolling Stone magazine on and off for over a decade. Roughly 10 years ago, it was great and I really enjoyed reading it. Since then I lost some interest in the magazine. I canceled my subscription but I'd pick up a copy every now and then.
Several months back, I started receiving copies in the mail again. I never paid for a subscription and never got the "Happy Birthday, here's a subscription" card from anybody. Nonetheless, I'm still getting the magazine every two weeks. The quality certainly has deteriorated but there's this other thing that's really starting to annoy me.

In March, Barack Obama dominated the front page. At the time he was ahead in the primaries and everybody was talking about him. I disregarded Rolling Stone's liberal stance chalking it up to the fact that the rag is about current events, and Obama certainly was a current event.
Then I noticed a similar trend on the cover of nearly every issue in my mailbox. "Sarah Palin's history of lies"; "McCain's track record of failure"; "Why John McCain will sink this country". Those headlines aren't exact but you get the idea.
I'm not saying I agree or disagree with Rolling Stone's political agenda. Personally, I'm registered independent and haven't made my decision yet. But I'd rather make the decision on my own terms without having Rolling Stone try to make it for me. I really don't need Pro-Obama/Anti-McCain propoganda shoved down my throat.
I don't remember Rolling Stone always having been like this. Even just 10 years ago, I don't remember politics being anywhere near the cover (except when the Clinton/Lewinsky thing happened but then what magazine wasn't talking about that?).
Fuck it, I'll just buy Penthouse and Hustler.
Posted by JPNor on Mon Oct 6, 2008 @ 9:32 am EDT | 5 Comments
Posted by Azuredreams on Mon Oct 6, 2008 @ 9:40 am EDT
Now THAT is the right attitude!
Seriously tho', I am 110% with you in the camp of deploring any type of propaganda from any avenue. I want facts, without rhetoric, to make my own decisions on. The prime place I can't stand politics is when I go to mass. Nothing, and I mean NOTHING, gets me to tune out faster to a homily than when the priest starts going off on a political rant. *grr*
Posted by BalekFekete on Mon Oct 6, 2008 @ 9:43 am EDT
PS - My last number is probably a little high.
Posted by TDrag27 on Mon Oct 6, 2008 @ 10:30 am EDT
Wow, I'd be even more aggravated at that than I am at Rolling Stone. At least the Obama camp is paying huge sums of money for Rolling Stone to focus so much on it. The priest is taking it upon himself to push his political viewpoints on the congregation.
Posted by JPNor on Mon Oct 6, 2008 @ 10:39 am EDT
Posted by Shashayla on Mon Oct 6, 2008 @ 10:44 am EDT
