blastchickbaby

Name: blastchickbaby
Joined On: Jan 13, 2007
Maintag: blastchickbaby
Age: 37
Occupation: Customer Service Rep
Location: Iowa
Currently: Offline
Last seen: 11/5/08

92 Member Points

View Members Homepage

My Gamertags

Xbox 360
blastchickbaby

My Clans

02/08/07

625

Recently my best friend told me I needed to work on my gamerscore. I cheekily replied ‘I am not defined as a gamer by my gamerscore’.
 
But you know…I kinda am.
 
My gamerscore currently sits at 625, thanks to a 60 pt gain last night from playing UNO. I didn’t try for the achievements, I didn’t look them up on the internet to find out the easiest strategies to unlock them, I just casually played the damn game.
 
Which pretty much sums me up as a gamer.
 
I just casually play the damn games.
 
I have fun. I play for a little while, switch to a different game, turn of the 360 and hop on the internet, go take the dog for a walk (a real one, not a Nintendog), play a board game with my kid, and then hop back on the 360 maybe.
 
I have nothing against those whose sole goal is to unlock achievements and do the equivalent of buying an expensive sports car to show off to their friends. Or those who play so much they are bound to unlock everything eventually. That’s their preference of game play.
 
I suppose if I could find one of ‘those’ games that completely captures me I would be back to being the gamer that stays up all night just to walk into work the next morning with the equivalent of a hangover.
 
I really like a lot of the 360 games. I adore the fast pace of Gear of War (even though I kinda suck), love the atmosphere in Condemned, highly enjoy slaughtering zombies in Dead Rising, and enjoy the technical play of WWE SvR.
 
But I haven’t found a Silent Hill. Or a Resident Evil. Or a Persona. Or a Romance of the Three Kingdoms. One of those games that is impossible to put down and that I can get lost in, in every way.
 
I don’t know if it’s the games that have changed, or if it’s me.
 
Or maybe both.


Posted by blastchickbaby @ 3:50 pm EDT | Permalink | 4 Comments

02/02/07

Entitlement

So, there is a thing going on in Iowa, where Sinclair broadcasting, the company that offers Fox around here, and Mediacom, the cable provider, are in a squabble about how much Mediacom should have to pay to offer Fox to it’s subscribers.
 
Long and short of it is that Sinclair is testing the waters with Mediacom, a mid-sized cable company, to see how much they might be able to suck out of a larger cable company. Also, Sinclair is asking for far more than any other broadcast company, and the controlling interest in Sinclair has holdings in the largest satellite provider around here. So it is all green on Sinclair’s part.
 
Anyway…who cares? Yeah, I miss Fox, but I’ll live. If I want it bad enough, I’ll get a UHF antenna.
 
The thing that gets me is how people are complaining that this adversely affects low-income families, that it is a hardship because cable costs may go up. Not having enough food to feed your kids is a hardship. Not having electricity to heat your home is a hardship. Not having money to pay rent is a hardship.
 
Not being able to afford cable TV to watch television that is available for free over the airwaves is not a hardship.  
 
Paying a high cable bill is a hardship on a low-income budget. I know…I’ve been there. 
 
I get very annoyed at the sense of entitlement that so many Americans have. I work with a state run program, and deal with low income families all day long. Most of them are honest, hard working people who have had a rough time, or something that has placed them where they are, or they have just had a lot of bad breaks.
 
But there is a portion of them that feel like the world ‘owes’ them for whatever reason. They don’t want to take responsibility for anything, and expect you to hold their hand and do all of the work. They don’t want to make phone calls, or fax something in…they expect you to do it all for them and hand them their free stuff.
 
I do believe social services and welfare are necessary. When I was pregnant, and shortly after the birth of my son, we received assistance. We needed it. We used it as it was intended, got back on our feet, and off of it. And there are those who genuinely need ongoing assistance due to their situation.
 
Do I feel for them? Absolutely.
Do I think it is a terrible hardship they can't have cable TV? Nope.


Posted by blastchickbaby @ 1:49 pm EDT | Permalink | 11 Comments

01/22/07

Love/Hate, and WWE

 

Okay, I admit it, there was a span of about seven years of my life that I used to watch WWE. Religiously. Early nineties kind of time. Back when the original DX was cool: before X-Puke. Back when the Rock was booed and a complete sissy. Back when my mouth would drop open in astonishment every time Vader did a moonsault. Back when they were the WWF. Back when WCW was its own vehicle (and before the joke that was the NWO)…Back when…

 

Okay, you get it ;)

 

That is where the love part of this post is. In my memory of the soap opera athleticism that was WWF.

 

But I just can’t get into WWE anymore. It just seems even more preposterous than before.

 

Okay, maybe not more preposterous…I mean, what was more preposterous than Goldust???

 

But it is more…gratuitous. Cheap. Shallow. And I don’t mean the sex, although it is quite gratuitous, cheap, and shallow. The Divas don’t bother me. It’s the violence, the blood. I don’t dislike aggression, or blood. I love the UFC, even watch boxing now and then, and rugby absolutely makes me drool. But there is a major, major difference. The blood and violence of those is a side effect of the stress and aggression of the sport. It hasn’t BECOME the sport. (though for a little while I was worried about UFC)

 

Back when I was watching WWE, and well before, blood was rare on WWE. The impact of seeing it was HUGE. I remember Mick Foley’s wife sincerely sobbing at the extreme abuse he was putting himself through for the show. Now it is obligatory, and taken for granted. It is there about every show. The blood is there because it is ‘supposed’ to be, and not as a side effect of a particularly hardcore moment.

 

WWE has become a parody of itself, which is really a feat, as it was a parody of the roots of wrestling as it was.  Wrestling was always scripted; the wrestlers have always been characters, but there was still a sense of pride and sincerity of the art that was WWF.

 

But it has lost all heart. It has lost that pride, and become a cheap Hollywood sequel. It is a poor knock off, and a celebrity impersonator hired by your corporate big wigs to impress.

 

*sigh*

 

But I still am playing WWE SvR 2007.

 

And, like the show, I have a love/hate kind of relationship with the game. I love the nifty new features, the stamina, the crowd in fighting, the environment, the create an entrance, and the reversals are SPECTACULAR.

 

But the character creation has been nerfed terribly. The wrestlers look wonderful. I LOVE the way the perspiration increases subtly on the skin as the match progresses, and the movements are extremely fluid. And the superstars have been captured perfectly. The facial morphing is very good. But the costume choices have been severely chopped.

 

And this is the part that really, really annoys me most. I can not play a female wrestler in season mode. I can’t get experience to progress her without tag teaming her with a male.

 

In a prior version for the PS2 (I think , I can’t remember which WWE game it is) you were able to designate your wrestler as ‘other’ instead of male or female, and then your female could play through anything a male could. 

 

Why not now? I can’t imagine any male WWE player would be disturbed that he was able to play a sexy female wrestler, and watch her body sweat through a season, instead of a big manly man. The majority of female toons I have met in the multitude of mmorpgs I’ve played were played by males, just for that reason. It was more fun to watch a female on the screen.

 

And I don’t think it is a huge issue regarding realism (it’s WWE, for cripes sake). There have been females that have fought males. Take Chyna, and Jazz. And this is a video game, a fantasy. It’s already built into the system that a low weight character can not use certain grapples and throws if his opponent is too much heavier than him, so what is the problem?

 

I know as a female I am the minority in the gaming world. But maybe the minority wouldn’t be so small if the female gamer was considered more often? I don’t think the compromise of letting female toons play in season mode is going to upset the male majority.

 

But, as annoyed as I am, I won’t give it up like I did WWE. I won’t say good-bye. I’ll keep playing.



Posted by blastchickbaby @ 10:52 pm EDT | Permalink | 2 Comments

01/20/07

Not. Gonna. Do-it.

So…I am a gamer.

 

There is no question about that.

 

But, I have come to the realization I am not a hardcore gamer. I am more the Cinemax After Dark kind of gamer.

 

Maybe that is why I will never, ever, buy a PS3 at the current price point. (lottery winner status excluded)

 

I suppose I should preface my further comments by stating that I am not a fanboy for any system. I have no Sony hate.

 

I love my psx and my ps2. I still play on both consoles. Just the other day I plugged Persona into the psx and made the little demons do their “Sexy dance. Sexy dance. Sexy Sexy Sexy dance”.

  

I even remember back in 1995-ish, two weeks after buying the 3DO how we realized what a mistake we had made. We sold the 3DO and the games we had for about 75% of what we had paid, took the financial hit and bought the Playstation. Never regretted a moment of it.

 

But I simply do not need a PS3. I can not in good conscience justify $600 for a gaming console. The titles so far really don’t get my heart a pumpin’, and even if they did, I still wouldn’t buy it.

 

I don’t care how wonderful it is, how powerful it is supposed to be, or any of that.

 

For 600$ it better make sure I am satisfied first (twice), make me breakfast in bed the next morning, and call me everyday for a week just to tell me how wonderful I am.  (Although if the PS3 came out with a game that did that, I might just consider deleting this and buying one, tee hee)

 

The one thing I like about the PS3, and this might be the girl in me, is the sleek and attractive design. Very nifty. I have a thing for metal finishes. ;) But that is not a reason to spend so many $$ on a console.

 

And there are no rumble controllers  That might seem like a silly issue, but I like my rumble. I like that feedback in my hands, telling me what a crap player I am.

 

 

And I know, I know, this is supposed to be so much more than just a console. It is supposed to revolutionize and blue ray and blah blah blah.

 

 

But it is what it is. A 600$ console with a crappy starting lineup.



Posted by blastchickbaby @ 11:04 pm EDT | Permalink | 10 Comments

01/20/07

Ah, CoH, why won't you let me go...

So, it’s a double xp weekend for CoH.

CoH. I have such a plethora of mixed emotions about this mmorpg. I love it, I loathe it, and I keep going back to it, just to remember why I left it in the first place.

I keep going back for the eye candy. The combat effects are wonderful, but mostly it’s the character creation that gives me optical cavities. No game yet has matched the flexibility and the creativity that CoH allows a player when they create their visual identity in the game. It is nice to be able to be an individual, and to recognize another character on sight, just by their particular suit. It’s nice to be recognized on sight.

I am disappointed that in WoW every tier 2 rogue looks like every other tier 2 rogue. I hate that when I was leveling I looked like I got dressed in the dark and walked out of the house with a blindfold on. At least in UO there were leather dye tubs, and colored ore. (If only UO had never implemented neon and flame gear *shudder*)

But once the novelty of a couple of hours of playing Barbie dress up with my toons wears off, I remember why I left CoH.

The Grind.

The Grind.

The Grind.

City of Villains helped a little. A little. But it is still a very, very basic level grind. Kill massive amounts of a certain type of ai mob. Rinse. Repeat. Level. Start all over.

Bleh.

Granted, most mmorpgs follow that simple formula, but in my experience there have at least been alternative ways to spend your time progressing in game…non combat skills like fishing and cooking, crafting skills, or the lovely, lovely housing system in UO (*drools* okay, give me a break, I am a girl, and I will not rebuke the stereotype). There have been quests that are not combat related, and little bits of fluff content here and there to soften the sharp edges of the mob kill for exp cycle.

In the well intentioned effort to create a simple, pretty, streamlined game, they neglected to think of the depth of the environment. CoH could be so, so much more.

And yet, even after all of that, I still look at the email sitting in my inbox, and think about going back. Just for a little while. Just to play Barbie dress up.



Posted by blastchickbaby @ 3:22 am EDT | Permalink | 10 Comments

6 of 10 of 10 First | Prev | Next | Last |

Blog Stats

Since 8/20/2006:

  • Viewed 3236 times
  • Bookmarked 9 times
This month:
  • Viewed 8 times
Subscribe:

My Consoles

Currently Playing

Friend's Posts

F.E.A.R.
snakemeister
(3:11 PM EST 01/08/09)
Rival Sucks
GroovyElm
(1:17 PM EST 01/08/09)
Respect?
trupundit
(11:18 PM EST 01/07/09)
A New Year....That Means New Goals....
Gatsu
(3:12 AM EST 01/05/09)
Dad Spam - Idea courtesy of JeepChick77
snakemeister
(12:27 PM EST 12/31/08)
2008 observations
trupundit
(12:01 PM EST 12/31/08)
Arcade machine designs.
Gatsu
(1:58 AM EST 12/31/08)
Don't let the name fool you...
Devonsangel
(4:26 PM EST 12/30/08)
Odd Shoe Day
snakemeister
(2:04 PM EST 12/30/08)
New Ink
snakemeister
(9:04 AM EST 12/29/08)